Home BFRO

Using Audacity to Get The Most Out of Your Recordings
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> Technical -> Techniques for AUDIO RECORDING -> Using Audacity to Get The Most Out of Your Recordings
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: February 22nd, 2010 10:29 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Over the last few months I've had the opportunity to review a lot of "wild life" audio which normally involves digital recorders used to capture sounds over great distances. Often these recordings produce faint, noisy results that to the untrained ear possess nothing of interest. But after some looking around and a little practice, I've learned some techniques that work for amplifying weak sounds while filtering out noise to improve audibility. This has allowed me to go back and review hours of recordings that I thought were basically empty, only to discover an amazing amount of very interesting audio. This has proven so useful that I thought it worth while to pass along this information to anyone else who may want to give it a try. So here's my approach to getting the most out of my recordings using Audacity.

Here's what you'll need: the free audio editing program Audacity (download from: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ , get the 1.3.x beta, it's stable and has the features needed for this work), a reasonably good computer (probably the one you're using now will be fine, I used a five year old laptop for most of my efforts), and a good pair of headphones (over the ear type are best, you don't want stray noise getting in the way).

After installing Audacity, here's the process I use to first amplify, then noise filter, and then secondary filter the recordings for best results.

Open the audio file you wish to edit in Audacity. If you have a long file, multiple hours, I recommend selecting/highlighting about 30 minutes of audio maximum to work with at a time (any more can take a long time to filter). After selecting the time frame you want to work on, click on "File" and then "Export Selection" to export your highlighted section to a new file, with a new name (this step is not necessary if you're working with files that are shorter than about 30 minutes).

Once you've opened the file you wish to edit, it will appear as a "spectrum" in its own little window. Go to the "Effect" menu and open it, then select "Amplify". The entire spectrum will be highlighted and a window will pop up. In that window it will provide a default Amplification(dB) and a New Peak Amplitude(dB). Normally it will automatically choose the amplification needed to achieve a new dB level of 0.0. This is often good enough for our purposes, and you can just click "OK" and be done. The whole file will be amplified. But you can also enter a larger or smaller amplification number and use the "Preview" button to see if you like the result better, then click OK and be done.

Next, we want to use the "Noise Removal" tool. First, click the little icon at the top of Audacity that shows a magnifying glass with a plus symbol in it. This will zoom you in one step for each time you click it. Zoom in until you can see the individual seconds of your recording, left to right across the top of the spectrum window. You want to find a spot in your recording that has the "noise" you want to remove, but has none of the faint background sounds that you want to keep. It takes practice, but you'll be able to spot these areas soon, they're normally the flattest part of the recording's spectrum. Once you've found that quiet, white noise spot in your recording, use your mouse to click and drag across a couple of seconds of that white noise. This will select that noise for use in the Noise Removal tool. Now, go to the Effect menu again and from there select the "Noise Removal" tool. A little window will pop up and at the top you'll see a button labeled "Get Noise Profile". Click it.

Next, on your keyboard, hold down the "ctrl" key and hit the "A" key (Ctrl-A for short). This will select the entire audio file again. Now go back to the Effect menu and select the Noise Removal tool a second time. In the section labeled "step 2" there are three numbers you can adjust. The Noise Reduction number is where you get the most bang for the buck. If it's a fairly quiet file you're working with, then a setting of 6 might be fine. If it's a very noisy file, you might try 12, 18, or even more. But be sure to use the "Preview" button in the lower left corner to see what your result will sound like. If you have the Noise Reduction number set too high, your result will have a "tinny" or metallic sound that is worse than the original noise. You want to select a number low enough to minimize that metallic sound, and high enough to minimize the noise in your recording. After setting the Noise Reduction number, you'll want to choose a number for the "Frequency smoothing" setting. I've always found 75 seems to be a good setting here. And finally, the "Attack/decay" setting, I normally set this to zero as my experiments have found no benefit to any other setting. Click OK and the noise will be filtered from your file.

Next step is to apply a "Low Pass Filter". Go back to the Effect menu, open it, and look way down at the bottom. Click on the Low Pass Filter. The settings I use most often in this window are 6 for the "Rolloff (dB per octave)" setting, the default (0.7) for the "Filter quality" setting, and 2000 for the "Cutoff Frequency (Hz)". Click OK and the frequencies above 2000 hertz will be increasingly reduced in volume by 6 decibels for every octave above 2000. The result is a recording with much of the high end hiss minimized. You might have noticed the "High Pass Filter" on the Effect menu as well. This works similar to the Low Pass Filter, but instead of letting everything lower than the cutoff frequency pass without modification, this will allow everything higher than your cutoff frequency to pass through. The High Pass Filter is useful for minimizing loud low frequency noise, like excessive wind noise on the microphone.

By this point, the Noise Filter and Low Pass Filters have probably knocked the overall volume level of your recording down a bit. So, as a last step, it might be advisable to re-perform the "Amplify" step described above. This should bring the recording level back up to 0.0 dB and make it suitable for basic listening on computer speakers.

Note that we haven't saved our work at any point in this process. Now might be a good time to to do so. But instead of saving it, you'll want to export it. Do this by selecting the "File" menu and then clicking on "Export". A box will pop up where you can enter a new file name (a good idea so that you don't over write the original file). Type in a new name and then hit OK.

As with anything, a little experimentation might improve your results. So feel free to play with those settings discussed above. But for a quick start to getting the most out of your audio files, these suggestions should work for most people.

Now you're done. You have an amplified sound file, with noise effectively reduced, and extraneous high end frequencies filtered out to improve audibility. Now give the file a play back through your head phones. Turn the volume up to a comfortable setting and you should be amazed at how much better the original audio sounds, and how many faint or previously inaudible sounds you can now hear clearly.
(Edited by monongahela)
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 
IntriguedLimey
Approved


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 593

 Posted: February 22nd, 2010 02:21 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

monongahela, this is very helpful. I have been aware of Audacity for a while but not done anything significant with it yet. Thanks a lot for going to the trouble to set it all out. I am hoping to attend a BFRO expedition this year and bring an Olympus LS-11 plus external stereo lavalier mic. If I do I will try and make the most of any recordings I capture with Audacity. Another piece of downloadable software I read about was Wavepad. You might want to check it out but I suspect it performs pretty much the same functions as Audacity:

http://www.nch.com.au/wavepad/masters.html



 
 
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: February 22nd, 2010 03:23 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Thanks IL,

I did look at Wavepad in the past, but since I run Linux on my computers, and I like to support Open Source software, I gravitated toward Audacity a long while ago. But after rechecking Wavepad, I see that it has many of the features I describe in my post above (not sure about Low/High Pass Filters, but suspect they're in there). So even if my Audacity specific instructions above won't port to Wavepad, the general three step approach should. Step 1 - Amplify, step - 2 - Noise Reduce, and step 3 - Low Pass Filter.

Good luck with your recording efforts. I read great things about the Olympus LS-11. At some point I hope to post a few more things I've learned about audio recording in the field, which helps me get the best possible recordings.
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 
IntriguedLimey
Approved


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 593

 Posted: February 23rd, 2010 03:44 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Yes, by the sound of it Audacity does a good job and it's free. I'm keen to get the LS-11 and try it out, and please do post your field recording advice which will be appreciated. One thing I learned from my last expedition - when recording overnight while sleeping in the tent, I had the DVR in the tent next to me, and an external mic on a cable attached to the outsdide of the tent. After checking recordings I found that it would have been better to put the mic further away because it's difficult to discriminate between snores, wheezes and movements of human tent occupants, and the stuff that might be going on outside. I don't know what you think but I would suggest putting the mic at least 10 feet away, or maybe further.
 
 
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: February 23rd, 2010 10:28 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

I completely agree. I've ruined some nice audio by keeping the mic to close to me. Next time out I plan to put the mic and recorder on a stand at the far edge of camp, 40 or 50 feet away. I'm more interested in recording sounds emanating from the woods, than from my camp. And if something visits while I'm asleep, the mic is sensitive enough to pick it up.
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: April 6th, 2010 10:32 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Just wanted to add a suggestion to this tutorial thread. Recently I've discovered that in some situations the Noise Reduction step described above does more harm than good. For some audio files, where the target vocal is faint, and very close to the noise floor, it seems the Noise Reduction tool may strip away valuable audio from the target sound, and increase the volume of neighboring noise (at least as I've applied it in the procedure above). To bring out faint sounds I've found it better to:

First - Amplify the sound, but conservatively, maybe 15dB max.
Second - Apply the Low Pass filter as described above.
Third - Amplify again, conservatively, maybe 10dB max, to achieve a comfortable listening volume with minimal noise.
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 
Steve Moon
Moderator


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 273

 Posted: July 23rd, 2010 10:34 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Hey Monongahela

This is really great information. Thanks. I've been using Audacity for a while but have been frustrated at not having enough time to explore its capabilities. I'll keep watching here for more tips and will start processing my sound files.

I keep the low pass filter off on my digital recorder when I'm recording in the field. Is this advisable do you think? If I'm going to apply the low pass filter on some of the sound files later anyway I am wondering what the difference might be. I guess I'll just have to experiment and report back here with my results. My feeling is that I want to record everything while I'm at it. I would hate to limit low frequency sounds.

Keep up the good work.
When the small craft warnings come out, then you go sailing.
 
 
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: July 23rd, 2010 11:42 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Steve, Good question and I feel the same way. Under most recording situations I don't use the low cut filter. I want to get those low drumming or growling sounds that happen from time to time. If I had low cut filter on, I might not have captured some very deep but soft grunts a few months ago.

The only time I've used the low cut filter is when I rigged my recorder up to a battery and left it running in the field for weeks on end. In that situation, using the low cut minimizes the amount of wind noise and saves storage space on the recorder.

But otherwise, capture everything you can and use software to filter noise out later, if necessary.

Good luck
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 
joseph
Approved


Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 174

 Posted: September 1st, 2011 08:08 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Monongahela. Can you recomend a decent entry level audio set up ? I just downloaded Audacity but dont have any equipment so im starting from scratch here . I cant go all out , but i dont want to skimp either . Thanks and good luck out there !
Time will tell all .
 
 
monongahela
Approved


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 971

 Posted: September 19th, 2011 10:09 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Joseph, sorry it took me so long to spot your post. I haven't trolled through this thread in a while. Anyway, my favorite rig for cost-effective start up in this arena is a combination of an Olympus Audio Recorder, like the WS-700 (about $50 on Ebay) and a good external, omnidirectional mic like this ($75): http://www.giant-squid-audio-lab.co...ast_stereo.html

With those two items and some AAA batteries you'll be able to record several nights of audio. After you get it all loaded to your machine start using Audacity to cut it up into manageable chunks, and then look at a tool like Sonic Visualisor to help you go through the audio a lot more quickly. Check out this thread on SV: http://s2.excoboard.com/BFRO/115578/2171353
Monongahela | http://sasquatchbioacoustic.blogspot.com | Attended BFRO Tennessee 2010, Pennsylvania 2011, Ohio 2012, West Virginia 2012
 
 




Joined:
Posts:

 Posted:   Edit Post Delete post Back to top

 
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> Technical -> Techniques for AUDIO RECORDING -> Using Audacity to Get The Most Out of Your Recordings All times are EST
Thread Options: Delete thread / Open/Close thread / Rename thread / Stick thread / Move thread / Merge thread
< Previous thread | Next thread > | Subscribe to thread |

Design based on Cobalt 2.0 theme by Jakob Persson
Copyright 2003-2005 Jakob Persson