 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moonfire197
Approved
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
|
 Posted: October 23rd, 2007 03:14 PM |
     |
|
If you let your mind play tricks on you you can make out a bear in pic three but there is no way to do it with pic 2. Look at pic 1 and 3 right next to one another. The eye shine is all wrong for it to be a bear when compared to the other two bears. This is not a bear. I have seen and killed bears in pennsylvania and this by no stretch of the imagination is a bear. I have pics of a manged bear from a trail cam when i find them I will post them for everyone to see. This is most definately not a bear. Also on pic 3 look at the two limbs closest to the camera, If this was a bear would they not be similar in length? They are obviously not. If I had to guess this is most definately a squatch.
I know what I saw.......
PS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paulm
Approved
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 281
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 03:23 PM |
|
|
Beenthere,
Those are some fair points, but I don't think that those pictures are conclusive in any way. They are interesting but inconclusive. I have nothing invested in the non-existance of BF and I have little doubt that BF is alive and well running around in the woods. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WVSLICK
Approved
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 323
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 03:26 PM |
|
|
To me pic three looks just like a bear looking straight at the cam and swiping the ground with its right front leg. Sorry thats what I see, like I said I hope I am wrong. And the side by side makes me think pic 2 is bear also. An older, large framed bear, but very skinny.
RICK R. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:13 PM |
|
|
| I'm Buck from Pa. I have personal interests in this subject, I think the torso is to short and the legs are wrong for it to be a bear and when its bent over you would see its nose. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
poacher68
Approved
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 117
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:15 PM |
|
|
I Don't know for sure what it is,but I know what it isn't and it isn't a bear!!
It's not how often you get knocked down that speaks of your character; it's how often you get back up. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Squatcher
Unregistered
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 989
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:17 PM |
|
|
Look at the difference in the length of the neck. How can that be a bear?
Eric Spinner
BFRO Investigator NJ PA DE |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rod
Unregistered
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:38 PM |
|
|
Wvslick has nailed on the head...its a bear looking at the camera, 2nd pic could easily be bear licking salt and as for eye shine not being as bright as the cub photo, reason could well be bear looked up split second after flash, it blinked, are far more likely scenarios than a half starved juvenie bigfoot in a yoga pose that would make sri srinath pappadum proud... i to would love it to be one but it aint..interestingly jonathan says that the photos are posted all over the net with the vast majority saying its a bear...are we 'maybe' abit tilted the other way, say abit biased even... in what we want to find in these photos...rod
for what its worth |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:41 PM |
|
|
rod
I still do not see what you are talking about.
Using the camera as the 6:00 postion and the tree as the 12:00 position, what ever it is, its moving towards the 10:00 position.
Or 9:30 position.
(Edited by jonathan820) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rod
Unregistered
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:50 PM |
|
|
johnathan, in pic 3 there are 2 eye shines looking at camera, not as bright as the cubs photo, but quite clear, once you see that it sort opens up..you see the ears, snout, right front leg is stretched out abit, left front looks turned in but it is probably just shadow from camera flash, even spine ridge...i am convinced and i wish i wasn't....hey wvslick you see what i see can you show the pic 3 again, i dont know how to do it, me and computers get on like you guys and iraq at the moment....
for what its worth |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHsu
Unregistered
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 49
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 04:58 PM |
|
|
| Rod I just cant see eye shine and a snout, I hunt bear in pa. are they in a different place where you come from. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:02 PM |
|
|
| Whsu, its an extinct ape but the head and limbs are of the same shape more so than patty |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:05 PM |
|
|
Bucker
Is this the pic that you wanted to post?
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:11 PM |
|
|
Yes, Thanks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rod
Unregistered
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:15 PM |
|
|
whsu, that aint no tassie devil.....bucker, i'll try again for you mate...the photo which most believe shows a juvenile bigfoot with its bony butt in the air, you know the one with it bent over...ok......ignore that impression, that is what is tripping people up...now eyes, 2 of em, looking at camera, there is eye shine....2 ears, ear on left slightly different angle due to flicking it or hearing something to its right..whatever....the 2 bony butts bones are left shoulder and probably left hip....snout you see once you make out ears, eyes etc....right front leg is extended out, left front normal but it looks like paw turned in....nah, just shadow from flash.....how am i doin bucker......we have koala bears here, huge maneaters, rip you to bits, grow 5-6 feet in length, make your grizzlies look like yogi bear mate....
for what its worth |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:18 PM |
|
|
| Rod, Im trying real hard give me some time on this one.. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:20 PM |
|
|
Just for grins and giggles, point out the eye shine.
Seriously, I do not see it.
I'm in no way trying to bash anyone.
But, for the life of me, I do not see eye shine.
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:22 PM |
|
|
| Maybe I need some of that Ausie brew your drink'n cause I think it must help. Any chance you could mail me some mate? |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kate1980
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 258
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:22 PM |
|
|
I see no eye shine what so ever, if it was indeed true eye shine it would stick out like a sore thumb, just as the first pic did with the bear cubs. Even if it was blinking or had its eyes half shut, you'd still see half shut eye shine, theres just no way around that.
If it is a bear, then he has one serious messed up front leg, theres no way that is a shadow, if it is a shadow, tell me where the rest of his paw is...?
Kate
Coastal British Columbia exped. 2008
New Hampshire exped. 2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:27 PM |
|
|
Here is a statue of it.
(Edited by Bucker) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 05:29 PM |
|
|
| Notice the head kind of the same shape in the standing photo. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chrisinalaska
Approved
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 113
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 06:15 PM |
|
|
I wonder if they looked for/found tracks? Perhaps the ground was too hard for impressions to be made. Anyone else bring this up?
The idea that pic 3 is a bear head on is an illusion in my opinion . The "eyes" are just some natural anomaly in the hair. And the left front leg's foot would be turned 90 degrees to the right. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 06:23 PM |
|
|
chrisinalaska
I think that you might be the first to bring it up. Not really sure. Good point.
As for the 3rd pic, I still do not see any eyes nor a head that many have stated. (not saying that you do).
Its a shadow that was cast over a rock. If everyone would look at pic 2 versus pic 3. We would see that it is the same rock located at the base of the tree. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rod
Unregistered
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 06:27 PM |
|
|
jonathan...look at the top photo you just posted...what is staring at you mate...2 bloody eyes...look do you want me to fly over there and show you......you can even make out its nose....someone anyone back me up here, bossburg, rkennedy you guys seem to have abit of pull, authority maybe, speak to him will ya.......keep looking it will suddenly open up once you get the eyes........how bad are the fires in california, seen abit of the 'huey lewis and the news' over here....and why don't we ever find kentucky fried bigfoot.......cheers
for what its worth |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 06:58 PM |
|
|
| Ill back you up now rod I see it! Thats even creepier than bigfoot, but I think its an optical illusion see the white armpit show up twice that shows up on both photos. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 07:12 PM |
|
|
I SEE IT! I SEE IT!
It was there staring me in the face this whole time.
Just kidding, mean no harm.
I'll delete it promptly. Sorry BFRO, been at this since yesterday with very little sleep. Hope it does not yank your chain or anyone else's.
BF does not obsess me, but this thread does.
For the life of me, I still can not see a bear.
Also, what you are calling eye glare in the location that you are speaking about, is nothing other than flash glare caused by the camera against the fur/hair/what ever you want to call it.
I'm blitzed, getting out of here. Need to get back to reading my Holy Bible.
Lord bless all. I'll check in once in a while.
Later! |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bucker
Approved
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 218
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 07:13 PM |
|
|
| If you have the pictures aligned and flip back and forth you can see impressions in the ground from the steps it takes to get into the bent over position. The right ear you see is actually not even part of the body but something behind the tree. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moonfire197
Approved
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 07:18 PM |
|
|
Look at the hairless patch on the left arm it is in the same position if this was a bear and it turned to look at the camera would the hairless patch move to the other side of the photo? JMO
I know what I saw.......
PS |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan820
Approved
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 265
|
| Posted: October 23rd, 2007 07:23 PM |
|
|
moonfire197
Yeah, it would. Look at all of my other post.
Threw this pic up as a spoof. Been anylizing the photo's for about 24 hours. Tierd.
Tierd of debating. Starting to feel like a presidential debate or something. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined:
Posts:
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
