Home BFRO

Comparing the evidence
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> Recordings -> Jacobs Photos - Pennsylvania -> Comparing the evidence
Southman
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 555

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 12:28 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Hey, Pragmatic...

How are things in the UK ?
I read that they had undermined Silbury Hill by digging too many tunnels. Please don't let it collapse. One of my favorite Megalithic earthworks.

Southman
 
 
Southman
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 555

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 12:55 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

See the "johndpatton comment" on the Face Now Visible thread.
 
 
halfsquatch
Approved


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 01:21 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

just my two bits. I am wanting more than ever to have someone prove that it's a sasquatch and at first I was super excited when I saw the pictures...

http://halfsquatch.blogspot.com/200...ld-bear-ii.html

I do believe in sasquatch. I believe that most reports are honest and truthful and I look forward to finding conclusive evidence (we're getting close!!!).
(Edited by Christopher Noel)
 
 
WVSLICK
Approved


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 326

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 01:33 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

OK, Im going to throw one back at you that has been asked of us bear people. If that is an eye where is the shine?
RICK R.
 
 
pragmatic
Approved


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 04:39 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Thank you Southman. For the first time someone has taken the trouble to show in detail why they think it's a sasquatch. I still prefer my bear's ear explanation, in my view it's 100 times more likely because that's the difference between bear and sasquatch population estimates. But at least I'm now convinced that not everyone who sees sasquatch here needs their eyes tested. Both explanations are within the realms of possibility, and we can only agree that the evidence is insufficient. Gamecams with video function are the answer IMO, so let's hope they get cheaper fast and many more are installed.
 
 
pragmatic
Approved


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 04:41 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Southman are you interested in the neolithic age in Britain? I'm somewhat of an expert. I'm halfway through a novel and I lead project management seminars in which you go back to the year 2345 BC to get the builders out of deep s**t.
 
 
Southman
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 555

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 02:29 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Hi, Pragmatic,
Yes, I've been interested in the circle builders and the stone circles since the 1970's. I find it fascinating.
(Edited by Southman)
 
 
Southman
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 555

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 02:38 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

WVSLICK...the eyes appear to be deepset (to me!), and it seems like the creature isn't facing the flash enough for eyeshine to reflect. Or, they might be closed. I'm really not sure.
 
 
Christopher Noel
Approved


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 620

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 03:24 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

I've put together a little video that frames my view of the truth. Included are enhancements by Southman and jackal, without which, of course, the video would have been impossible. Check it out if you get the chance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4zsqiK-XJI
There are two possibilities, and two only. Either Sasquatch does not exist--in which case all of the thousands of sincere eye-witness accounts, as well as centuries of Native American wisdom, are false--or else it does exist, and if it does exist, it has survived alongside Homo sapiens only by being far more elusive than Homo sapiens can imagine.
 
 
blb57
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 07:04 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

If that's a head between the legs in #3 it must have fallen off. You would think if it wanted to put it's head on the ground it would have been easier to bend the front leg a bit. Still looks like two bears to me, one over the other. We'll get a picture someday, I just don't think this is it.
Someday . .
 
 
jackal
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 102

 Posted: November 6th, 2007 10:50 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Hey, we are owned by three rottweilers. Though big dogs, they can get into amazing positions trying to nab a morsel of cheese *lol*. I have seen them rub the sides of their faces on the ground, ending up in that position. I don't have much talent as a dog trainer, or I would teach them to do that on command *lol*

My grand daughter tried to demonstrate that posture as well, but her legs are way too long. She had the upper body portion down, but could not straighten her legs all the way.

Just more ideas from over here ~*~
"Instead of your own freedom, think how you can free others." ~ Pearl S. Buck
 
 
pragmatic
Approved


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 150

 Posted: November 7th, 2007 02:21 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Whoa Jackal! Careful now. What you're implying there with the story of your granddaughter is "pics are of a quadruped"!
 
 
jackal
Approved


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 102

 Posted: November 7th, 2007 09:04 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Well, at 5, she sometimes seems part quadruped *lol*
"Instead of your own freedom, think how you can free others." ~ Pearl S. Buck
 
 




Joined:
Posts:

 Posted:   Edit Post Delete post Back to top

 
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> Recordings -> Jacobs Photos - Pennsylvania -> Comparing the evidence All times are EST

Page: 1 2
Thread Options: Delete thread / Open/Close thread / Rename thread / Stick thread / Move thread / Merge thread
< Previous thread | Next thread > | Subscribe to thread |

Design based on Cobalt 2.0 theme by Jakob Persson
Copyright 2003-2005 Jakob Persson