Home BFRO

Puget Sound Tracks
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> NEWS MAKERS -> Snow Tracks Photos -> Puget Sound Tracks
Navigator
Administrator


Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 292

 Posted: March 10th, 2009 07:21 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top



Derek Randles will be available to answer questions about the tracks, but not about the area where the tracks were found.

There is a private property involved here, along with a lot of cameras that will be set up in the nearby woods over the next few weeks.

Derek,

Please reply to this thread to show you are online and receiving information.

We are hoping to receive more information about activity in the Puget Sound region of western Washington State.

 
 
Rictor
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 27

 Posted: March 11th, 2009 03:10 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

I looked at all the snow track reports and I believe this one is the real deal. My question is, out of all the 24 tracks, was it a single animal alone? And is there any idea how old the snow tracks were?
 
 
ravellette
Approved


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 371

 Posted: March 11th, 2009 06:33 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

When a sasquatch is moving slower (i.e. their tracks show a shorter stride) the pattern is more like the zig-zag pattern of a human walk. As the stride gets longer, however, the footprints are more or less directly in front of each other.


Now if you look at the Wisconsin pattern, the prints were long strides and straight. Just as much Snow!
If you build it, they will come!
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 11th, 2009 08:38 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

these look amazing! they just scream Bigfoot to me! awesome guys!
the truth is out there....
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 13th, 2009 08:19 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Rictor wrote:
I looked at all the snow track reports and I believe this one is the real deal. My question is, out of all the 24 tracks, was it a single animal alone? And is there any idea how old the snow tracks were?


Rictor, I'm pretty sure the tracks were about 4 or 5 hours old.
There was only one animal. It left tracks the day before but they were very melted.
 
 
arcturus
Approved


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11

 Posted: March 15th, 2009 11:53 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Derek, was there any other evidence or signs in the area? and how deep was the snow?
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 16th, 2009 10:37 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
arcturus wrote:
Derek, was there any other evidence or signs in the area? and how deep was the snow?


I was in the area due to an investigation. Two days before the tracks were found we heard many vocalizations in the area. Since then we have gathered several hair samples, some of which are now under study. The research there is on-going. We have several cameras deployed, and continue to search the area vigorously.

The snow was only about 2 or 3 inches deep. There was only snow left in the meadow.
 
 
streetmedic
Approved


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 96

 Posted: March 16th, 2009 11:33 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Too melted to tell, but like some of the others, it could be rabbit jumping in deep snow. None of the traks are fresh and have no detail. Above pic #1 are some simular traks but cant see them very well. I have hunted Rabbit befor and thats the way Im leaning.
John
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 17th, 2009 10:27 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
streetmedic wrote:
Too melted to tell, but like some of the others, it could be rabbit jumping in deep snow. None of the traks are fresh and have no detail. Above pic #1 are some simular traks but cant see them very well. I have hunted Rabbit befor and thats the way Im leaning.


The tracks above pic one are my tracks.
All due respect, these are not rabbit tracks. I've been a wildlife tracker for 23 years, and I can assure you, I do know the difference. These tracks were not made by a rabbit. The tracks continued into the woods for some distance. Up grades, down hills and around corners. I followed them until they came to a hard pack dirt road where I lost the trail. These are not the only Bigfoot tracks found at this site.
 
 
Cervelorod
Approved


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5

 Posted: March 17th, 2009 01:56 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Links to pics?

Any less general statement than Puget Sound area? North / South, Olympia, Port Angeles?
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 17th, 2009 02:27 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
streetmedic wrote:
Too melted to tell, but like some of the others, it could be rabbit jumping in deep snow. None of the traks are fresh and have no detail. Above pic #1 are some simular traks but cant see them very well. I have hunted Rabbit befor and thats the way Im leaning.

I've hunted rabbits also and used to live in New Hampshire where they have snowshoe hares, the only problem I have with your theory is the rear part of the footprint is way to wide to be a rabbit. most of the rabbit tracks i've followed in the show have a definite triangular shape to them due to the fact that the front feet are smaller and more round than the rear feet that are placed around and in front of the front feet.and the snow just wasn't deep enough for the body of the rabbit to be rounding it off IMHO.
I always am looking for the naturtal cause for something like this BEFORE jumping to the conclusion it HAD to be Bigfoot. in this case I can't say rabbit at all. at least not from the photos shown here.
(Edited by Trax)
(Edited by Trax)
the truth is out there....
 
 
Bossburg
Administrator


Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1963

 Posted: March 17th, 2009 03:21 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Cervelorod wrote:
Links to pics?

Any less general statement than Puget Sound area? North / South, Olympia, Port Angeles?


Please read the information on this page:
http://www.bfro.net/news/SnowTracks/index.asp
Then read the information on this page:
http://www.bfro.net/news/SnowTracks/WA-tab.asp

You will notice that IF a location is given (or not) there is a reason. We've asked that people not request more information as to location.

Thanks,



Bossburg
 
 
streetmedic
Approved


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 96

 Posted: March 18th, 2009 04:20 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Derek Randles wrote:


The tracks above pic one are my tracks.
All due respect, these are not rabbit tracks. I've been a wildlife tracker for 23 years, and I can assure you, I do know the difference. These tracks were not made by a rabbit. The tracks continued into the woods for some distance. Up grades, down hills and around corners. I followed them until they came to a hard pack dirt road where I lost the trail. These are not the only Bigfoot tracks found at this site.


Thanks for the coment Derek, its nice to have more info to go with the tracks. Are they the best photos you have?
John
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 18th, 2009 10:20 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
streetmedic wrote:


Thanks for the coment Derek, its nice to have more info to go with the tracks. Are they the best photos you have?


Thanks John. Yes I do have more pictures. If you send me an e-mail I'd be happy to send them to you. Actually, the best one I have didn't get used here. D
 
 
Bavarian Raven
Approved


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 62

 Posted: March 18th, 2009 04:39 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

at first glance i thought they might be old snowshoe tracks, but when i enlarged them (am using a crappy old PC atm) you can see that they do indeed look "humanish" (in the fact that the shape and the such resembles an overly large human track). very interesting find...
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 20th, 2009 10:08 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Bavarian Raven wrote:
at first glance i thought they might be old snowshoe tracks, but when i enlarged them (am using a crappy old PC atm) you can see that they do indeed look "humanish" (in the fact that the shape and the such resembles an overly large human track). very interesting find...


The stride was really amazing. Even down through the woods it never really short stepped. I found it impossible to match.
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 20th, 2009 10:21 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Derrek, how did you locate the first set of tracks you found in this area? what brought you to this particular location in the first place?
the truth is out there....
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 20th, 2009 10:27 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

also, have you noticed a pattern in the way a BF walks? as in do they always walk in a straight line like theyre on a mission to go somewhere and not meandering here and there in a random pattern? you can tell feeding tracks of a deer as well as a track of a buck on a mission when he's looking for a receptive doe during the rut.
the truth is out there....
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 10:57 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Trax wrote:
Derrek, how did you locate the first set of tracks you found in this area? what brought you to this particular location in the first place?


I was in the area investigating a report. The tracks were found on the third day of the investigation.
 
 
ravellette
Approved


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 371

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 11:13 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Were they three days old that you know of?
If you build it, they will come!
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 11:14 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Trax wrote:
also, have you noticed a pattern in the way a BF walks? as in do they always walk in a straight line like theyre on a mission to go somewhere and not meandering here and there in a random pattern? you can tell feeding tracks of a deer as well as a track of a buck on a mission when he's looking for a receptive doe during the rut.


Every good track line I've ever found travels in a very straight line, with the exeption of terrain and obstacles. I found one track line in the Blue Mts that actually walked backwards in a straight line in and out of a tree line.
 
 
ravellette
Approved


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 371

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 11:17 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Instead of turning around, it went backwards out of the tree line? Hmmmmm
If you build it, they will come!
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 11:21 AM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

backwards? how could you tell that? and why would they do that? that one sounds like the work of a hoaxer to me. if the BF was trying to avoid being seen it might back up for a short ways to get back into cover then turn and exit the area. thats my take on it.
the truth is out there....
 
 
davec46
Approved


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 224

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 02:29 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

maybe the bigfoot was following the scent of deer
I'm interested in Bigfoot
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 04:45 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
ravellette wrote:
Instead of turning around, it went backwards out of the tree line? Hmmmmm


IT walked out of the tree line about 4 steps, and then instead of turning around it just backed up. I think it might have had it's eyes on something. There was a foot trail about 40 yards away. I'm guessing here, but I think it saw something on the trail and backed up slowly.
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 04:49 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Trax wrote:
backwards? how could you tell that? and why would they do that? that one sounds like the work of a hoaxer to me. if the BF was trying to avoid being seen it might back up for a short ways to get back into cover then turn and exit the area. thats my take on it.


When it backed up, it stepped on the other tracks. Not exactly on top of them, but close.
 
 
Derek Randles
Approved


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 04:53 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
ravellette wrote:
Were they three days old that you know of?


I think they were only 4 or 5 hours old. It was warming up very fast.
 
 
ravellette
Approved


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 371

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 06:42 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Wow what luck having them so fresh.
If you build it, they will come!
 
 
Trax
Unregistered


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 174

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 08:43 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

Quote:
Derek Randles wrote:


When it backed up, it stepped on the other tracks. Not exactly on top of them, but close.

I think that's very interesting! especially the part where you said it stopped and then backed up. I can totally visualize that. too cool!
the truth is out there....
 
 
davec46
Approved


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 224

 Posted: March 23rd, 2009 08:56 PM  Edit Post Delete post Back to top

me to. maybe it smelled some thing and decided to turn around
I'm interested in Bigfoot
 
 




Joined:
Posts:

 Posted:   Edit Post Delete post Back to top

 
Post new topic   Post reply    BFRO -> NEWS MAKERS -> Snow Tracks Photos -> Puget Sound Tracks All times are EST

Page: 1 2
Thread Options: Delete thread / Open/Close thread / Rename thread / Stick thread / Move thread / Merge thread

Design based on Cobalt 2.0 theme by Jakob Persson
Copyright © 2003-2005 Jakob Persson