BFRO / Official BFRO Question and Answer / Archives / 04-22-2009 / pics in video fake? real

Topie: pics in video fake? real
January 28th, 2009 01:49 PM
silky mama In viewing this video, ive never seen before, I was wondering about some of the pics.
I counted 34 in total and wonder if some are indeed real.
9, 10, 11 look fake to me, --15 is too far away.
Are 14,17,18,21,22,23,24, 28,30,31,31 real? # 27 cant see clearly.
I am especially interested in ---the imags taken by a group safari with "something" standing on the Frasier river bank ,
the kevinkimberly.com 2004 and Spokane Wash. May 24, 1973, of a poss mom and baby. What is the BFRO's
feelings on the video of pics?
January 28th, 2009 02:01 PM
silky mama sorry forgot to add the video link DUH!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo9unjITTLM
January 28th, 2009 09:42 PM
jinhu1 None of the images shown are new. They've all been around for a while.

1, 2, 16, 25, 26 all contain photos that I would consider to be valid as they come from the Patterson-Gimlin film or the Jacobs Photos. Of course the creature in the Jacobs photos has still not sucessfully identified either way.

8, 12, 21, 29, 33 & 34 are not not photos, they are artistic renderings.

4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 17, 19, 20, 27, 28 & 32 I will classify as inconclusive. Not enough to make a determination.

3, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 18, 22, 23, 24, 30 & 31 I would say are fakes.

Just so there aren't any misunderstandings, I have to add that I DO NOT speak for the BFRO.